|
In the big city,
full of shiny facades, fancy shop-windows and blinking neon lights,
it's hard to imagine that the small painted square called a painting
should be able to attract much attention. That is, never the less,
what happened last Spring when out of the corner of my eye, I spotted
a strange monochrome matter- a "something" that most of
all looked like melted plastic-toys from my childhood - smeared
onto a canvas.
The painting radiated a strange "floating" light, very
much like the blurr that comes from standing in the middle of a
boiling hot dessert without your sun-glasses on, trying to concentrate
on what you see- and realizing that you see nothing at all. A view-less
nothing, lost horizons and the lack of perspective.
In Central Asian art perspective isn't used. Instead, the aboriginal
art, has a topographical sense. In the desert of Arizona the most
fantastic American artists unfold their art. James Turrell has completely
abandoned the plan and works in pure light only, as seen from the
inner of a volcano. So, how does it look like in Bagdad?
It was a small painting by Madhat Kakei that caught
my attention that day in Spring. He is born 1954 in Kirkuk in the
Southern.part of Iraqi Kurdistan, a couple of hundred kilometers
north of Bagdad where he attended art school in the early 1970'ies.
He graduated from Madrid in Spain and then moved on to Sweden. He
shares his time between destinations as different as Japan and Sweden,
where he works and lives. I met him at his exhibition in Copenhagen
and visited him at the studio that was at his disposal here in town.
The small painting wasn't all by itself in the world. Not at all.
Madhat paints with the palet-knife, as did the
Swedish August Strindberg, who was of the opinion that a painting
should be finished in two or three hours because inspiration never
lasts longer. When Strindberg painted it could compare to a sexual
drive. Kakei, however, paints his works in several layers that in
the end segments an index of color along the edge, recollecting
the time (lost) since the process started. Thus, there is a lot
of Western thinking in Kakei's paintings. But Madhat Kakei's world
seems deeper and more Oriental.
They don't want to be real paintings, those wordless messengers
where the painter phrases a sentence in light that opens up to a
mysterious universe.
If it isn't the desert light, or the caligraphy of the palet-knife,
that is being investigated, then it is surely the method of Strindberg
being examined.
Kakei's paintings are not scientific like Bauhaus-art,
nor are they familiar with the higher spheres of geometry. Maybe
it is precisely their lack of orientation and restless nomadic desire
for change, that gives them the ability to catch your attention
in the middle of a noisy world. Madhat Kakei´s paintings are,
in short, poetic like Arabian verse.
Erik Steffensen, Artist, Professor, Royal
Danish Academy of Art, Copenhagen.
|